Pharma Marketing Network Home

John Mack

Pharma Marketing Blog represents the opinions of
John Mack
Publisher of
Pharma Marketing News.



We accept advertising relevant to the interests of our members.
For more information, see:

Media Kit





Operated by:
VirSci Corporation
PO Box 760
Newtown, PA 18940
215-504-4164
215-504-5739 (FAX)
E-mail: infovirsci@virsci.com
Pharma Marketing Blog


My Humble Opinion
Pharma Marketing Blog
Other People's Opinion
Pharma Marketing Talk
A "Must Read" Blog for Insiders. -- Wall Street Journal A bi-weekly podcast. Listen and call-in live online or download to your iPod!

| Also see Pharma Marketing News OpEd Pieces |

What's Up with the Veramyst "Brief Summary" Print Ad?

Posted: September 6, 2007

You may have seen the new direct-to-consumer (DTC) ads for Veramyst on TV. I have. The one piece of information my wife and I took away from that ad was "may cause cataracts"!

Maybe that's why GSK is running a very strange Veramyst print ad that is merely the "brief summary' -- which is neither brief, nor a summary -- aka, patient package insert (PPI). The image above shows the ad just as it appears in the September 10, 2007, issue of Time Magazine. It's prominently placed on a right-hand page within an editorial piece about John Edwards where you can't miss it!

What's up with that?

For more on this, read today's post to Pharma Marketing Blog.

For more posts in related topic areas, see:

If you wish to receive notice by email whenever a post is made to Pharma Marketing Blog, please subscribe.

Enter your Email Address

| Return to Pharma Marketing Blog Topics |

Print DTC: How Does It Measure Up?
A Quantitative Analysis of Risk vs. Benefit Information

FDA suggests that drug advertisers focus their risk disclosures on the most important and the most common risks and to do so in language easily understood by the average consumer. This is often referred to as the "less is more" approach (see "FDA Draft Guidance for Print DTCA: Less than Feared").

The "less is more" argument shouts out for a quantitative analysis of risk vs. benefit information in print DTC ads. Such a quantitative analysis would be useful to establish at least a baseline for further discussion about whether or not the creative sections of print DTC ads for prescription drugs carry too much risk information.

To perform the analysis, over 60 drug ads that appeared in several major consumer magazines were analyzed. In each, the space allocated to images, benefit statements, risk information, and the brief summary was measured. This article summarizes the findings.

Topics covered include:

  • Space Allocated to Image
  • Image Area by Indication
  • Space Allotted to Benefit Statements
  • Space Allotted to Fair Balance Statements
  • Benefit vs Risk
  • Images and Fair Balance
  • Consumer-Friendly "Brief Summary"

  • Includes Data Pack with Tables
Order the Full Article Reprint - $7.95

Pharma Marketing News | Subscribe | Discussion Forums | Roundtable | Podcasts | Blog
Daily News Briefs | Surveys | Resources/Links | Glossary | Case Studies | Reports
Pharma Marketing Vendor Directory | Conference Calendar | Pharma Jobs
Advertising Information | FAQs | About Us | Privacy Policy

© 2007. VirSci Corporation. All rights reserved.