Posted: April 22, 2007
Lilly dropped its Prescription Assistance Program (PAP) for the poor as of December 31, 2006.
At least one Wall Street analyst -- Merrill Lynch's David Risinger -- points out that Lilly's bottom line is benefiting significantly from this action: "Many prescriptions were transitioned to Medicare Part D and other funding sources, which compensate Lilly at a dramatically higher level for prescriptions. Hence, Lilly is realizing a significant net price benefit in 2007 (vs. 2006) for a number of products (in particular Forteo)."
Risinger implies that Lilly had no choice but to drop its PAP due to Medicare Part D rule.
But there a way around Medicare's anti-kickback statute for pharma companies that truly wish to continue their patient assistance programs. Lilly simply chose not to take advance of it.
For more on this, see today's post to Pharma Marketing Blog.
For more posts in related topic areas, see:
If you wish to receive notice by email whenever a post is made to Pharma Marketing Blog, please subscribe.
| Return to Pharma Marketing Blog Topics |